Can you beat Amazon in storage efficiency?

What could you find out about the cost efficiency of Amazon’s logistics? By the way, Amazon’s pricing is insanely transparent. It is a good resource for benchmarking. Amazon has two operating models, FBA and FBM. FBA = the product is delivered from Amazon’s warehouse and FBM = the product is delivered from the seller’s warehouse. In this article, I will focus on the costs of FBA.

Jonne Välilä from notified me of the following page: // Amazon’s pricing is incredibly simple: the use of storage space a month + processing fee. I made the toaster example on the web page the foundation for my calculations. So, the internal logistics of a toaster cost £4.09 + storage (1 month) £0.26 = £4.35 = €5.07.

We can calculate the costs elements in accordance with the amazing (although old) Wadelma research (image below). According to rumours, a similar research has been repeated in England a few years ago and the percentages were close to those of Wadelma. (If someone could link the research, I would be very grateful.) So, from the €5.07, 56.6% is personnel costs, meaning €2.9 per row.

Here in Finland, our warehouse personnel costs are about €36,000 a year (meaning all costs, not just salaries), 200hrs on sick leave, 1,500hrs on row, which means that the work costs amount to €24 an hour.

This makes the overall efficiency: €24 per hour / €2.9 per row = 8.4 rows per hour. Does not sound too bad, right? Well, we can do better than eight rows in an hour! Here lies the most common pitfall: this is specifically about the overall efficiency per hour. Which refers to all departing rows’ relationship to all the work performed in the warehouse. Meaning that all supervisors, recipients, transporters, cleaners, inventors, collectors and packers have to be included in that. Unfortunately, we see a lot of warehouses where they try very hard, but the overall efficiency loses clearly to Amazon’s eight rows per hour.

What is the overall efficiency of your warehouse?

I went over the last four initial warehouse reviews we here at Leanware have compiled. One warehouse came close, but the three others were clearly weaker. But our clients who implemented the LeanwareWMS system keep on telling us great success stories about how they have achieved a level of efficiency that clearly superior to Amazon’s.

It is our vision to make Finnish companies the most competitive in the world and we are making possible by continuously improving our client’s internal logistics. With the status Amazon has in the market, the demands for storage efficiency are emphasized more than ever before. An initial review is our service that helps you get started: you are given an analysis of the current situation of your warehouse and also a wide variety of measure recommendations to help and improve it. Contact us and get the benefits of our vision!

Subscribe to our newsletter

By subscribing to our newsletter in Finnish, you will receive the latest blog posts and information on Leanware’s events and news directly in your inbox.

    This form is protected by Google reCAPTCHA, and Google’s privacy policy and terms of use are applied.


    LeanwareSCM up and running in 24 hours

    You should reserve plenty of time, maybe months, to launch new software. Sound familiar? Usually the most time-consuming part of launching a new system is to integrate it with existing software. The integration stage can take weeks or even months. Read more

    Warehouse is a warehouse

    At worst, a warehouse is just that and nothing else – and its significance as… Read more

    Production digitalization systems

    Do you like three-letter acronyms such as ERP, PLM, PDM, APS, MES, WMS or OPC? If you have already dealt with issues and questions related to digitalization of production before, you will probably be familiar with at least some of the abbreviations listed above. Read more